Before and after for Chrome on Mac notification icons displayed by Chrome vs.It’s a lightweight controller on iOS platform based on WKWebView (UIWebView would be the base Kit under iOS 8.0).ValueThe element is drawn like a container for a checkbox, which may include a prelighting background effect under certain platforms. Normally it would contain a label and a checkbox.The element is styled as the text field for a menulist. Note: The animation-duration property defines how long an animation should take to complete. If the animation-duration property is not specified, no animation will occur, because the default value is 0s (0 seconds). In the example above we have specified when the style will change by using the keywords 'from' and 'to' (which represents 0 (start) and 100 (complete)).No special styling is applied.
Add Back And Forward Animation To Chrome Mac Notification IconsI suspect that these and other similar issues relate to the unfortunate decision to continue using a cross-platform UI toolkit (XUL).Personally, I've also found that, despite Firefox's distinction as the browser to popularize the idea of extensions, it now tends to lag in that department. To add to that point, the first high-dpi (retina) laptops were released in 2012, and nearly three years later, Firefox still contains a reasonable number of icons that aren't in 2x (Retina) resolution. Firefox still doesn't have bounce scrolling. It took them nearly half a year to fix the lack of auto-hiding scrollbars nightly builds, and even longer for it to finally make it to mainline Firefox. Thes best latex editor for macChrome benefited greatly simply from observing the design decisions of Firefox, IE, etc. At the time Chrome was released, it was the only browser with this design, because it's much easier to do when starting from scratch. Finally, it's still not multi-process (though it's finally getting there.) > So still not in stable and Chrome has had it for what? 4 years now?Chrome is a much newer browser. But of course, making sure the browser remains stable for its millions of users is a top priority as well, alongside developing these new features.IIRC Chrome did not have this feature day 1, they added it after the fact. If Firefox hadn't had significant market share, it could have made this change much more rapidly without fear of breaking things for existing users. It doesn't mean that Chrome won't be able to keep up at all with these changes eventually it just means that it's not great to compare a brand-new browser with one that's been around (and used!) for a long time.Electrolysis (the name for the project) took much longer in Firefox because they had to essentially retrofit an existing browser that hadn't been designed this way from the start. Now, at least IMHO, Chrome is BETTER and so I've switched again. When FF came out (and in it's heyday) no one said "You can't compare FF to IE, FF is a brand new browser" No, instead they/we all switched to FF because it was BETTER. Of course I can compare the two, they both do the same thing at the end of the day (provide a portal to the internet). Right now, for me, that browser is Chrome (I couldn't care less which browser has been around longer).As for "it just means that it's not great to compare a brand-new browser with one that's been around (and used!) for a long time" this is so wrong. Also "Chrome benefited greatly simply from observing the design decisions of Firefox, IE, " Yes and Firefox benefited from observing the browsers before it, so what?> "In ten years (assuming Chrome is still around then), it will also have similarly antiquated design decisions that make sense to us now,"You can't say that with any certainty whatsoever maybe Chrome will fair better than FF has or maybe we will see a re-write of Chrome's core to deal with future changes.As I said elsewhere in this thread I will use the browser I deem best at the current point in time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorJoe ArchivesCategories |